Gen Y doesn't really exist, Gen X, either -- here's why

Trying to stay out of the debate about different generations in the workplace (or anywhere!) is like trying to walk out of quicksand. I stepped in it again the other day. So here's my considered response -- Gen Y: there's no such thing. Gen X: a myth. Baby Boomers: a blip.

Really -- do you want to hang your identity on a label that somebody slapped on your back when you weren't looking? If you do, here are some of the common traits attributed to Gen Y:

  • trend-conscious
  • Idealistic, optimistic, and flexible
  • Socially responsible; particularly concerned about the environment
  • Very comfortable with technology; like to multi-task
  • Have a hunger for feedback and rewards

Likewise, for Gen X, you'll see none of those characteristics. Instead, substitute:
  • Cynical,
  • Media savvy
  • Individualistic and self-reliant
  • grew up during economic downturn
  • work ethic

So let's dump the term "generation" -- just for a minute. Let's say instead that you've been out of school for 2 years. OK, do you have that picture?

Now, let's think 12 years out of school. What's changed? Do you still frequent Taco Bell for your dinner? Do you still make the same mistakes on the job, and off the job?

All right, leap through time another 10 or 20 years.
Do you have a longer view of careers, family, politics, work ethic, important technology vs. gadgets?

I'm betting you do, and that it has continued to change and mature you, and will continue to do so. I'm also betting that this difference in maturity levels is what causes generational friction. Sometimes, you want to learn from other people's mistakes, and not repeat them. And sometimes you want to make your own mistakes.

I say again -- Gen Y doesn't exist. People do exist at a different level of maturity, people who have learned different things, perhaps, from others' mistakes. Perhaps from yours.

You can agree with me if you wish. But if you disagree, you run the risk that I'll decide that you don't exist, either.

Tell me off, if you think I'm wrong.

Photo by Ha-wee

P.S. Speaking of levels of maturity, I was fascinated by some major trending topics on Twitter this past weekend -- #balloonboy and #Sue Sylvester (look it up!) as well as #bostonisbetter. Doesn't this sound like "normal" times?

3 comments:

Kate said...

As fun as it would be to fight you on this, I (almost) completely agree. Reminds me of my post a couple weeks ago about generational differences in willingness to make mistakes -- it's not about generations, it's about work/life experience.

At the same time, I guess there's something to be said about the way society operates and feels about things at certain points in history, and I think it's reasonable to think that those dynamics in a person's upbringing could have an affect on the way he or she thinks or acts. But I think it's less about this and more about No. 1.

Anonymous said...

Sooo ... in order for the "generation" definitions to be accurate, they will probably need to update the definitions every couple of years to make sure they go with the age-group's maturity.

ken said...

Exactly my point. My perspective? Forget about labeling generations altogether. It makes about as much sense as labeling decades (which, thankfully, we seem to have stopped doing).

Define people by what they do as individuals, and by what experiences they share. Shared attitudes, on the other hand, are kind of a myth, don't you think?

Post a Comment